- Group Decision Making
- Process gains in group decision making, including:
- information pooling
- Combine ideas
- Combine ideas
- group memory (transactive memory)
- As a whole, the group can remember more information
- As a whole, the group can remember more information
- error correction
- Swiss Cheese Model
- motivational factors.
- Decision Acceptance
- Commitment to implementation
- Decision Acceptance
- Process losses in group decision making, including:
- Groupthink
- Majority influence
- Asch Studies
- (funny 70's video about people judging which line is longer)
- (funny 70's video about people judging which line is longer)
- Information blocking
- Murder Mystery Example (in class activity)
- Polarization (choice shift)
- Choiceshift (groupshift)
- People who meet together and already have ideas in mind make more rash decisions
- People who meet together and already have ideas in mind make more rash decisions
- Risky Shift (in domain of losses)
- Conservative shift (in domain of gains)
- Explanations
- Information Blocking
- Extreme individuals become more extreme
- Extreme alternative is valued higher after discussion
- Information Blocking
- motivational factors.
- Diffusion of responsibility
- Social loafing
- Diffusion of responsibility
- Groupthink
- The leader-participation model
- 5 decision-making styles
- Decide
- consult individually
- consult group
- facilitate
- Delegate
- Decide
- 4 decisions outcomes (leaders can affect these four areas)
- Decision quality
- How wise, well-reasoned, and sound the idea is
- How wise, well-reasoned, and sound the idea is
- Implementation
- How committed employees are to implementing the idea
- How committed employees are to implementing the idea
- Cost of decision making
- How efficient (cost-wise) the decision making process is
- More meetings/participative-decisions = more $ spent
- How efficient (cost-wise) the decision making process is
- Development
- Employee development through decision making process
- Those involved become more experienced employees
- Employee development through decision making process
- 7 contingencies (that determine when different decisions-making styles are appropriate)
- Decision significance
- How significant is the decision to the success of the project or organization?
- How significant is the decision to the success of the project or organization?
- Importance of commitment
- How important is the team member's commitment to the decision?
- How important is the team member's commitment to the decision?
- leader's expertise
- Does the leader (you) possess the knowledge or expertise related to this problem?
- Does the leader (you) possess the knowledge or expertise related to this problem?
- likelihood of commitment
- If you were to make the decision yourself, what is the likelihood that the team would commit itself to the decision?
- If you were to make the decision yourself, what is the likelihood that the team would commit itself to the decision?
- group's support for objectives
- To what degree does the team support the organization's objectives at stake in this problem?
- To what degree does the team support the organization's objectives at stake in this problem?
- group expertise
- Do team member's possess the knowledge or expertise related to this problem?
- Do team member's possess the knowledge or expertise related to this problem?
- team competence.
- Do team members have the ability to work together in solving problems?
- Do team members have the ability to work together in solving problems?
- The zone of indifference.
- "the range within each individual in which he or she willingly accepts orders without consciously questioning authority"
- Relates to the "Likelihood of commitment" contingency
- "the range within each individual in which he or she willingly accepts orders without consciously questioning authority"
- How to determine which decision-making style to use in different situations based on the leader-participation model and the process gains/losses model.
- Learning: group > pooling > best > average
- Problem solving
- Simple: pooling > group > best > average
- Quantitative/deductive: best > group > pooling > average
- Complex/ambiguous: group > best > pooling > average
- Simple: pooling > group > best > average
- Brainstorming: pooling > group > best > average
- Learning: group > pooling > best > average
- Group and Team Processes
- the distinction between a group and a team
- Group
- A group is two or more people that purposefully and repeatedly interact over time in order to achieve goals.
- A group is two or more people that purposefully and repeatedly interact over time in order to achieve goals.
- Team
- A team is a group characterized by high interdependence and agreed-upon common goals.
- these terms:
- team effectiveness
- Group performance judged by
- Output
- Social Processes
- Learning
- Output
- group efficacy
- A feeling that the team has the capability to successfully accomplish its task
- A feeling that the team has the capability to successfully accomplish its task
- group social identity
- The perception of members as a "group" rather than as a set of unique individuals, and a shared (usually positive) image of the group
- The perception of members as a "group" rather than as a set of unique individuals, and a shared (usually positive) image of the group
- group cohesion
- The degree to which members identify with the group and are motivated to remain in the group
- Group cohesion increased by:
- Smaller size
- Success
- Common threat
- Exclusivity
- Perceived similarity
- Competition against other groups
- Smaller size
- The degree to which members identify with the group and are motivated to remain in the group
- group norms
- An unwritten, often implicit rule that defines what attitudes and behaviors characterize a "good" group member versus a "bad" group member or what constitutes acceptable behavior, attitudes, and feelings
- An unwritten, often implicit rule that defines what attitudes and behaviors characterize a "good" group member versus a "bad" group member or what constitutes acceptable behavior, attitudes, and feelings
- self-managed team
- Team that is self directed (no supervisors or middle managers due to downsizing)
- Team that is self directed (no supervisors or middle managers due to downsizing)
- virtual team
- Teams that work across space, time, and organizational boundaries with links stenghtened by webs of communication technologies
- motivational issues in groups (specifically how to reduce social loafing)
- Make sure that each team member's contribution is identifiable
- Design tasks so they are intrinsically involving, attractive, or engaging (so they enjoy doing the work)
- Assign responsibility and make the responsibility public
- Make sure that each team member's contribution is identifiable
- The distinction between group content and group process
- Group Content Factors
- What do groups work on, what are group goals
- What do groups work on, what are group goals
- Process factors
- Conflict
- Task: conflict about group content (good)
- Interpersonal: dislike between group members (bad)
- Task: conflict about group content (good)
- Leadership
- Appointed: assigned through organizational hierarchy
- Emergent: informal, shared
- Appointed: assigned through organizational hierarchy
- Become familiar interpersonally (spend time)
- Specialize
- Share unique information (information seeking)
- Promote task conflict (create norms that task conflict is OK)
- Avoid too much turnover
- How task conflict and interpersonal conflict affect groups
- Task: conflict about group content (good)
- Interpersonal: dislike between group members (bad)
- Task: conflict about group content (good)
- The 5-stage model of group development (italicized comments are what the book recommends a "good leader" do)
- Forming
- Group establishment, first interactions
- Clarify purpose of group, work on establishing trusting relationships
- Group establishment, first interactions
- Storming
- Group conflict (over roles, leadership, etc)
- Focus on common vision, model constructive conflict management, and legitimize expressions of individuality that do not hinder productivity
- Group conflict (over roles, leadership, etc)
- Norming
- Develop common purpose and norms (often formal rules)
- Set norms, provide positive feedback, and prevent groupthink
- Develop common purpose and norms (often formal rules)
- Performing
- Substantive group work
- Help group run itself, foster development of group traditions, encourage group to evaluate its effectiveness.
- Substantive group work
- Adjourning
- Encourage the group to reflect on, learn from, and celebrate its achievements
- Encourage the group to reflect on, learn from, and celebrate its achievements
- Task and maintenance behaviors
- Task process
- Focuses on how groups accomplish their work
- Examples-- setting agendas, figuring out time frames, generating ideas, choosing techniques for making decisions and solving problems, and testing agreement
- Examples-- setting agendas, figuring out time frames, generating ideas, choosing techniques for making decisions and solving problems, and testing agreement
- Types of behavior relevant to a group's fulfillment of its tasks (NOT ON SLIDES-may not be needed) (page 260)
- Initiating
- Seeking information or opinions
- Giving information or opinions
- Clarifying and elaborating
- Summarizing
- Consensus testing
- Reality testing
- Orienting
- Initiating
- Maintenance process
- How groups function with regard to meeting group member's psychological and relationship needs
- Examples -- Issues with leadership, membership, norms, communication, influence, conflict management, and dealing with difficult members and dysfunctional behaviors
- Examples -- Issues with leadership, membership, norms, communication, influence, conflict management, and dealing with difficult members and dysfunctional behaviors
- Types of behavior needed to keep a group in good working order (NOT ON SLIDES-may not be needed):
- Gatekeeping
- Encouraging
- Harmonizing and compromising
- Standard setting and testing
- Using humor
- Gatekeeping
- The causes of self-oriented emotional behavior and the 3 "pure types" of emotional behavior
- Causes of Self-oriented emotional behavior
- The problem of identity
- Who am I here? How am I to present myself to others? What role should play in the group?
- Who am I here? How am I to present myself to others? What role should play in the group?
- The problem of control and power
- Who has the power in the situation? How much power, control, and influence do I have in the situation? How much do I need?
- Who has the power in the situation? How much power, control, and influence do I have in the situation? How much do I need?
- The problem of goals:
- Which of my needs and goals can this group fulfill? Can any of my needs be met here? To which of the groups goals can I attach myself?
- Which of my needs and goals can this group fulfill? Can any of my needs be met here? To which of the groups goals can I attach myself?
- The problem of acceptance and intimacy
- Am I accepted by the others? Do I accept them? Do they like me? Do I like them? How close to others do I want to become?
- Am I accepted by the others? Do I accept them? Do they like me? Do I like them? How close to others do I want to become?
- Types of emotional behavior that result from tension and from the attempt to resolve underlying problems:
- Tender emotions
- Love, sympathy, desire to help, need for affiliation with others
- Love, sympathy, desire to help, need for affiliation with others
- Tough emotions
- Anger, hostility, self-assertiveness
- Anger, hostility, self-assertiveness
- Denial of all emotion
- 3 "pure types" of emotional behavior
- Friendly Helper
- Acceptance of tender emotions, denial of tough emotions--"Let's not fight, lets help each other"
- Acceptance of tender emotions, denial of tough emotions--"Let's not fight, lets help each other"
- Tough Battler
- Acceptance of tough emotions, denial of tender emotions -- "Let's fight it out!"
- Acceptance of tough emotions, denial of tender emotions -- "Let's fight it out!"
- Logical Thinker
- Denial of all emotion--Let's reason this thing out
- Denial of all emotion--Let's reason this thing out
- Dysfunctional Groups
- Understand how the following issues may contribute to groups making bad (or even disastrous) decisions:
- Groupthink
- 'A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action' (Janis, 1972).
- Effects
- Limited consideration of alternatives
- Follows initial majority preference
- Limited information sampling
- Limited use of outside resources
- Preference for confirmatory information
- Ignore implementation difficulties
- Limited consideration of alternatives
- Remedies
- Encourage members to discussing doubts
- Leaders remain impartial
- Strengthen outside ties & consider the interests of outsiders
- Invite outside experts
- Devil's advocate
- Use subgroups
- Give alternatives second chances
- Encourage members to discussing doubts
- 'A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action' (Janis, 1972).
- group cohesion
- majority influence
- group roles
- Zimbardo Prison experiment
- Zimbardo Prison experiment
- group authority
- Milgram Experiments (Test Conductor tells subject to zap other person)
- Remedies
- Emphasize other roles outside the group
- Question authority
- Hold to individual values
- Maintain ties outside the group
- Whistleblowing
- Emphasize other roles outside the group
- Milgram Experiments (Test Conductor tells subject to zap other person)
- Understand the major remedies, including:
- encouraging members to express doubts
- protecting minority voice
- using devil's advocates, bringing in outsiders
- effective group leader behavior
- emphasizing individual roles outside the group
- Whistleblowing
- Reporting to the government, the media, or the public acts of misconduct by organizations of which the whistleblower is a member or former member. Often the organizational misconduct has the potential for public harm.
- encouraging members to express doubts
- Organizational Culture
- Define organizational culture and understand its function in organizations
- Organizational Culture:
- The pattern of shared assumptions, values, and beliefs that lead to certain norms of behavior
- "The way we do things around here"
- "The way we do things around here"
- Define and identify subcultures and countercultures
- Subculture:
- Subcultures usually share the dominant culture's core values as well as other values that characterize their own department, geographic unit, etc.
- Subcultures usually share the dominant culture's core values as well as other values that characterize their own department, geographic unit, etc.
- Countercultures
- Values are in opposition to those of the dominant culture
- Know the major sources of organizational culture, including:
- beliefs and assumptions of founders
- Founders typically hire and retain people who think the way they do
- Founders typically hire and retain people who think the way they do
- employee's learning experiences
- new beliefs and values brought into the organization by new members
- Describe how internal integration strengthens and perpetuates an organizational culture
- Socialization and training "teach them the ropes"
- People in organization can easily recognize dominant values
- People in company within the company are rewarded for acting in accordance with dominant values
- Socialization and training "teach them the ropes"
- Understand the distinction between strong cultures and weak cultures
- Strong cultures have core values and beliefs that are intensely held, more widely shared, and more ordered
- Describe how strong cultures can affect organizational performance (both positively and negatively), as well as the effect of external fit on how culture influences performance
- Organized cultures result in control, alignment, and motivation…but do not yield high performance unless it is "in fit" with the environment
- Pros
- Clear sense of purpose
- Commitment and loyalty
- Pride in working for the organization
- Values that serve as standards of reference for decision making
- Clear sense of purpose
- Cons
- Resistance to change and conformity
- Risk of becoming obsolete if company does not value learning and staying in-tune with environment
- Resistance to change and conformity
- Organized cultures result in control, alignment, and motivation…but do not yield high performance unless it is "in fit" with the environment
- Understand the processes through which culture is transmitted to new organizational members, including:
- Socialization
- Systematic process by which organizations bring new members into their cultures
- Hiring, "boot camps/humiliation", "work your way up the ranks", incentives/bonuses, role models
- Hiring, "boot camps/humiliation", "work your way up the ranks", incentives/bonuses, role models
- Stories
- Folklore -- HP examples
- Folklore -- HP examples
- Symbols
- Way the office is decorated, hiring-rooms as first contact with potential employees
- Way the office is decorated, hiring-rooms as first contact with potential employees
- Jargon
- Acronyms, internal language
- Acronyms, internal language
- rituals
- How employees communicate and how meetings are ran
- How employees communicate and how meetings are ran
- Know the primary and secondary mechanisms through which leaders create or change organizational cultures
- Primary mechanisms
- What leaders pay attention to, measure, and control on a regular basis
- How leaders react to critical incidents and organizational crises
- When the market takes a dive, are there layoffs? Reduced hours? No changes?
- When the market takes a dive, are there layoffs? Reduced hours? No changes?
- How leaders allocate scarce resources
- Deliberate role modeling, teaching, and coaching
- How leaders allocate rewards and status
- How are whistleblowers treated?
- How are whistleblowers treated?
- How leaders recruit, select, promote, and excommunicate
- What leaders pay attention to, measure, and control on a regular basis
- Secondary mechanisms
- Organizational design and structure
- Systems and procedures
- Rites and rituals
- Design of physical space, facades, and buildings
- Stories about important events and people
- Formal statements of organizational philosophy, creeds, and charters
- Organizational design and structure
- Articulate the difficulties associated with trying to change an organizational culture.
- Organizational Design and Structure
- Define organizational design and organizational structure
- Organizational Design
- "The process by which organizational leaders match internal organizational structure and processes to organizational strategy and technology and external environment"
- "The process by which organizational leaders match internal organizational structure and processes to organizational strategy and technology and external environment"
- Organizational Structure
- Organizational structure is the system of relationships among job tasks, roles, and responsibilities that determines the coordination of people and technologies inside organizations
- Define these aspects of org. structure
- Hierarchy
- The distribution of formal authority in an organization
- The distribution of formal authority in an organization
- span of control
- The number of subordinates that report to a manager
- The number of subordinates that report to a manager
- centralization (decentralization)
- The degree to which organizational decision making is centralized at a single point in the organization.
- The degree to which organizational decision making is centralized at a single point in the organization.
- Complexity
- the number of levels (vertical) and departments or jobs (horizonal) inside an organization
- Specialization
- The degree to which organizational tasks are divided into separate jobs.
- The degree to which organizational tasks are divided into separate jobs.
- Standardization
- Degree to which similar work activities are performed in a similar manner
- Degree to which similar work activities are performed in a similar manner
- Routineity (of technology)
- The degree of task variety required of an organization's main production technology
- The degree of task variety required of an organization's main production technology
- Formalization
- The degree to which formal rules and procedures govern organizational activities
- Distinguish between organic and mechanistic organizations
- Mechanistic
- Mechanistic organizations are rigid bureaucracies with strict rules, narrowly defined tasks, top-down communication, and centralized decision making
- Everyone has jobs and the work is predictable (e.g. McDonalds)
- Tall hierarchy, small span of control, highly centralized, complex, highly specialized, highly standardized, highly formal
- Everyone has jobs and the work is predictable (e.g. McDonalds)
- Organic
- Organic organizations are flexible, decentralized networks with broadly defined tasks
- Anyone talks to anyone, decentralized authority
- Short hierarchy, large span of control, decentralized decision making, low standardization, low formalization
- Anyone talks to anyone, decentralized authority
- Understand the tension between differentiation and integration in organizations
- Differentiation
- Specialization leads to efficiency gains
- But specialization can make coordination difficult
- Specialization leads to efficiency gains
- Integration
- Behaviors and structures used to coordination work in differentiated organizations
- Behaviors and structures used to coordination work in differentiated organizations
- The tension—both differentiation and coordination are needed, but they require different processes.
- Recognize and discuss strengths and weaknesses of these structures:
- Simple
- Functional
- Strengths
- allows specialization & economies of scale and scope
- allows standardization
- allows specialization & economies of scale and scope
- Weaknesses
- Difficult to coordinate across functions
- slow decision making
- promotes distinct subcultures and department goals
- limits diversity of background
- Difficult to coordinate across functions
- Divisional
- Strengths
- allows customization & customer focus
- good coordination across functional areas
- faster decisions
- clear goals
- allows customization & customer focus
- Weaknesses
- Expensive
- poor knowledge sharing between divisions
- loss of economies of scope and scale
- Expensive
- Matrix
- Strengths
- Good knowledge sharing
- quick decisions possible
- allows for extreme customization
- Good knowledge sharing
- Weaknesses
- Unclear authority structure
- conflicting demands
- reduced employee motivation (in many cases)
- Unclear authority structure
- Horizontal
- Strengths
- Very quick decisions
- low management costs
- increased employee motivation
- customer focus
- Very quick decisions
- Weaknesses
- Poor inter-team coordination
- difficult for new employees
- Poor inter-team coordination
- Network
- Strengths
- Focus only on core competencies
- low management (& start up) costs
- rapid change possible
- Focus only on core competencies
- Weaknesses
- Low control over partners
- constant renegotiation
- difficult where specialized inputs are needed
- Low control over partners
- Boundaryless
- Simple
- Suggest appropriate structures for organizations based on the following contingencies
- Size
- Strategy
- low-cost, first-to-market, quality, customization
- low-cost, first-to-market, quality, customization
- Technology
- routine, non-routine, craft
- routine, non-routine, craft
- Size
| Simple | Functional | Divisional | Horizontal | Matrix | Network | |||
Size | tiny to small | medium to large | medium to huge | small | small to medium | small to large | |||
Strategy | all | low cost, quality | customization, quality, cross-selling | Innovation, first-to-market | innovation, customization | Low cost, first-to-market | |||
Technology | craft, non-routine | routine | routine | non-routine | non-routine | routine | |||
- environmental complexity and stability
- Organizational and national culture
- Organizational Environments
- Understand the components of an organization's task environment
- Any actor with which the organization interacts various times each day (eg.bank) are part of the task environment
- Any actor with which the organization interacts various times each day (eg.bank) are part of the task environment
- Define formal and informal institutions and describe how each is enforced
- Articulate how the general environment impacts organizations
- General Environment:
- The set of broad economic, natural, technological, and social forces that impact an organization
- The set of broad economic, natural, technological, and social forces that impact an organization
- Macroeconomic forces
- Interest rates, consumer spending
- Financial markets
- Interest rates, consumer spending
- Technological forces
- New production technologies
- New markets created by technological development
- New production technologies
- Demographic forces
- Population, workforce changes
- Population, workforce changes
- National culture
- The natural environment
- Define the Following:
- resource dependence
- asymmetric dependence
- symbiotic interdependency
- between an organization and its suppliers and customers
- Outcome of one is input of other
- between an organization and its suppliers and customers
- competitive interdependency
- between an organization and its competitors
- between an organization and its competitors
- resource dependence
- Describe the factors that influence how dependent an organization is on another actor
- Explain the strategies that an organization may use to respond to a new demand, including:
- Avoidance
- controlling demands
- organizational change
- buffering strategies
- Avoiding dependance
- Insuring supplies of important resources
- Stockpiling
- Manage environmental fluctuations by storing needed inputs
- Manage environmental fluctuations by storing needed inputs
- Leveling
- Putting pressure on suppliers and customers to avoid fluctuations
- Putting pressure on suppliers and customers to avoid fluctuations
- Forecasting
- Predicting environmental fluctuations
- Predicting environmental fluctuations
- Diversifying
- Avoiding dependance
- bridging strategies
- Avoiding control
- Creating relationships with other organizations to manage interdependency
- Symbiotic interdependency
- Contracting
- Co-optation
- Strategic Alliances
- Mergers (vertical)
- Contracting
- Competitive interdependency
- Associations
- Strategic Alliances with competitors
- Government intervention
- Cartels
- Mergers (horizontal)
- Associations
- Avoiding control
- managing the institutional environment
- Conformity
- Passively conform to existing institutions
- Passively conform to existing institutions
- Decoupling
- Give the appearance of conformity
- Give the appearance of conformity
- Lobbying
- Change formal institutions by appealing to regulators and legislators
- Change formal institutions by appealing to regulators and legislators
- Grass-roots influence
- Appeal to the public, change informal institutions (and possibly formal institutions)
- Appeal to the public, change informal institutions (and possibly formal institutions)
- Avoidance
- Global Environment
- Define Hofstede's 5 dimensions of national culture
- Power distance
- The extent to which people in a country view inequities in wealth, status, and physical well-being as normal and acceptable.
- High power distance countries allow inequities to persist
- Low power distance countries attempt to reduce inequities
- The extent to which people in a country view inequities in wealth, status, and physical well-being as normal and acceptable.
- Individualism
- Individualism: The extent to which people in a country feel comfortable acting as individuals instead of in groups.
- Individualistic cultures value personal freedom, personal achievement and competition
- Collectivistic cultures value cooperation, cohesion, and group harmony
- Individualism: The extent to which people in a country feel comfortable acting as individuals instead of in groups.
- Achievement orientation
- Achievement orientation is the extent to which people in a country focus on results and value performance above personal development.
- Achievement oriented cultures value assertiveness, success, and competition
- Nurturing oriented cultures value personal growth, quality of life, and care for the disadvantaged
- Achievement orientation is the extent to which people in a country focus on results and value performance above personal development.
- Uncertainty avoidance
- The extent to which people in a country feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and variation.
- High uncertainty avoidance cultures value structure, social order, and conformity and may appear intolerant of diversity.
- Low uncertainty avoidance cultures value diversity, and tolerate individual variation
- The extent to which people in a country feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and variation.
- Long-term orientation
- Long-term orientation: The extent to which people in a country value distant life and work outcomes relative to proximate outcomes.
- Long-term oriented cultures value thrift and persistence
- Short-term oriented cultures value fulfilling social expectations and present quality of life
- Long-term orientation: The extent to which people in a country value distant life and work outcomes relative to proximate outcomes.
- Understand how national culture impacts:
- Personality
- National individualism is positively related to individual extroversion scores
- National power distance is positively related to individual conscientiousness
- National achievement orientation is positively related to neuroticism
- National uncertainty avoidance is positively related to neuroticism and negatively related to agreeableness
- National individualism is positively related to individual extroversion scores
- Motivation
- Individual goals are better motivators in highly individualistic cultures
- Inequity perceptions are more significant motivators in low power distance cultures
- Cultural differences (in long-term orientation and uncertainty avoidance and achievement orientation) affect how people value different work outcomes (expectancey theory)
- Individual goals are better motivators in highly individualistic cultures
- Decision making
- People from collectivistic cultures are less subject to the fundamental attribution error.
- People from collectivistic cultures are more accepting of group decisions than are people from individualistic cultures.
- People from collectivistic cultures are less subject to the fundamental attribution error.
- Group processes
- People from collectivistic cultures generally feel more comfortable working in teams.
- People from collectivistic cultures are less likely to free ride in group situations.
- People from collectivistic cultures generally feel more comfortable working in teams.
- Organizational culture
- An organization will have difficulty succeeding in a country whose culture is incompatible with the organization's culture.
- A strong organizational culture can facilitate interactions between employees from different cultures.
- An organization will have difficulty succeeding in a country whose culture is incompatible with the organization's culture.
- organizational structure
- People from high power distance cultures are especially uncomfortable working matrix organizaitons.
- Global Strategies
- Multinational
- Multidomestic
- Transnational
- Multinational
- People from high power distance cultures are especially uncomfortable working matrix organizaitons.